|
Civic Webs Virtual Library |
|
A
Set of Projects for Achieving Sustainable Economic Development on the Horn of
Africa |
Prepared
by
D A C O -- DAvies COnsulting GmbH
on
behalf of an
International
Development Trust
(in
formation)
15
August 1997
©
Jack L. Davies
1997
DACO
proposes that the International Development Trust implement a set of
inter-related projects defined here to achieve sustainable
economic
development on the Horn of Africa.
The
long-term strategic goals are
to
create a concentration of high-tech companies on the Horn of Africa along
the model of “Silicon Valley“ in
California, that reaches a “critical mass” ready for spontaneous growth
by itself within 5 years of starting, and
to convert the Horn of Africa into an East-African “Tiger“, along the model of the East-Asian “Tigers” (Japan, Hong Kong, Taiwan, South Korea, Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines) --
with
rapid economic development starting with a
“Silicon Valley”, but with a broader technological basis, that develops
throughout the Horn of Africa in parallel with the more-concentrated “Silicon
Valley”.
The
short-term strategic goals are
to
develop infrastructure that is necessary
for achieving the long-term strategic goals and
to
quickly create jobs at lower levels of
technology that will stimulate the economy and contribute to stability for
achieving the long-term strategic goals.
Pre-requisites
in the areas of infrastructure must be met,
before these two long-term strategic goals can be achieved, in the areas of
health,
education,
financial
services,
computing
and telecommunications,
transportation,
and
energy.
Many
other organizations are actively engaged in improving the health
services
on the Horn of Africa and therefore DACO proposes that the IDT leave this task
to them.
DACO
proposes to focus the investments and efforts of the IDT upon improving the
level of education for a larger number of
more-mobile professionals in the fields of high technology and management with
highest priority. It is also
necessary to substantially increase the level of know-how
and experience of these professionals in specific strategic areas.
In
the area of financial services, DACO
proposes that the IDT create a regional venture-capital
company that provides not only venture capital, but also cooperates
with other partners to develop regional mutual
funds,
a regional stock market, and a modest
program of micro-lending
to the very-poor people. By
providing venture capital, this company will take the initiative in promoting start-ups
of new
high-tech companies
and well as infrastructure projects in the private sector.
DACO
proposes that the IDT should make substantially-higher levels of computing
and telecommunications capabilities available to a large
number
of students, government administrators, and private entrepreneurs.
This will include a large number of personal computers, together with
telecommunications capabilities for high-speed ISDN communications,
interconnections among computers via local intranets
as well as to the international Internet and
WWW (World-Wide Web).
DACO
also proposes that the IDT consider some projects in the areas of transportation
and energy in the private sector. For transportation, we
focus upon projects that quickly create a large number of jobs and promote large
exports -- that also create local jobs and general economic development.
For energy, we focus upon projects
that have a symbiotic relationship with other projects in the field of
transportation as well as to decrease the pressures upon deforestation.
Most
potential investors in developing countries
are only willing to invest at levels of technology that have
already been developed successfully
in the given country -- or at lower levels.
We focus upon the difficult aspect of starting at the top at the leading
edge in at least a few carefully-selected technologies, which is more difficult;
but this automatically opens the doors for other investments to follow, without
requiring assistance from the IDT, at levels of technology lower than those that
the IDT will be implementing.
DACO
has given careful though over several years in our selections of technological
areas where we propose to quickly achieve excellence at the state-of-the-art on
the Horn of Africa. These choices,
as well as our proposed methods for achieving these levels of excellence, are
open to debate. In such an
innovative experiment, it is absolutely necessary to maintain complete
flexibility to immediately
create
new projects when unique opportunities arise,
expand
successful projects, and
reduce
or cancel projects that are not successful.
This
is the reason why DACO insists that the IDT implement these projects completely
under the control of its own set of subsidiary private
trusts and companies, that can apply modern methods of project management from
the private sector. This avoids the
bureaucratic necessity of obtaining approvals from committees, governmental
organizations, or international organizations.
To do otherwise, would immediately create inflexible new bureaucracies
that are not needed and would lead to failure.
The
approach at the beginning is admittedly dictatorial.
It is like the situation of two parents conceiving a child, over which
they will have nearly dictatorial control as long as it is a small baby. However, as the child matures, it will become increasingly
independent and leaves the home of its parents.
The projects that the IDT arbitrarily launches will also mature,
developing viability of their own, and hence independence as they mature.
As this set of projects matures and becomes viable, DACO proposes that
control over the International Development Trust at the top, as well as the
trusts and companies below it, be transferred to local ownership and control.
Commercially-successful projects should be spun-off of from their
non-profit parents to become independent business enterprises owned by local
citizens -- as soon as they are able to do so.
DACO has placed a strong focus upon recycling local “flight capital”
as well as mobilizing free local capital to take over equity ownership of all
companies that the IDT creates.
One
goal is to quickly create as many new locally-owned
private companies as possible, that will in turn be able to
successfully grow within a functioning free-market
economy. It is
definitely not a proposed goal to create a foreign empire “holding” most of
the profitable companies on the Horn of Africa.
The
set of projects proposed here are interrelated, with strong symbiotic effects,
designed to create the pre-requisite conditions necessary for a “Silicon
Valley” and then an East-African economic “Tiger” to evolve spontaneously.
They are based upon intensive study over the past 10 years of the local
political and economic situation together with the natural resources available.
The
combined efforts of the World Bank, the United
Nations, and bilateral
foreign aid
over the last several decades have generally failed
to contribute significantly or efficiently to achieving such goals in
Africa. Particularly the World Bank
has recognized this sad reality and has reacted constructively, by attempting
several major reforms in its policies to improve its own performance.
It is extremely difficult however for any large bureaucratic
organization, particularly one that was created politically, to design and
implement truly innovative reforms. Traditionally,
true innovation usually comes from small organizations in the private sector,
generating models and successful precedents that then can be integrated and
implemented in the public sector.
The
strategies and proposals presented here by DACO should not be seen as criticism
of the past or competition with international efforts in the present. Rather,
they should be seen as an example of how a small private organization can most
effectively experiment innovatively to develop new models that may also be
useful for international organizations later.
The
projects presented here by DACO have been defined innovatively using new
strategies. Therefore, this set of projects may be interpreted as an
experiment with a new model for Africa -- or
more generally for most developing regions of the World.
If this model is successful, it should be possible to copy it in other
developing regions of the World. If
it fails, it must be discarded and other better models must be developed.
As
examples of new strategies,
DACO has proposed a strong focus upon
developing
the basis for high-tech services that
can be performed with moderate labor costs and exported electronically
without local ecological damage, rather than low-level
manufacturing based only upon low labor costs or simple
exploitation of local mineral resources;
engaging
local personnel to implement all development projects, thereby
creating local jobs that in turn create local stability for projects; and
promoting
projects that result in a broad base of local citizens
becoming the ultimate owners
of the projects and resulting companies in their homelands and countries.
DACO
proposes that all of these projects be implemented by the IDT in the private
sector using private funds through a set of subsidiary trusts and companies that
it creates for this purpose. The
major trusts and companies, together with their roles, are shown in Figure 1
on page 8 and are listed here:
International Development Trust, registered off-shore -- will create and initially own the following trust and companies
Horn-of-Africa
Education Trust, registered locally -- will provide scholarships,
grants to schools, and support for curricula development
Horn-of-Africa
Institute of Advanced Technology, registered locally -- will provide
infrastructure of computers with interconnections via intranets and
Internet, post-graduate scholarships abroad, and 10 “Departments”
conducting research at high levels in selected strategic areas
Horn-of-Africa
Venture-Capital Company, registered offshore with local
subsidiaries -- will provide venture capital for high-tech start-ups,
privatizations, and infrastructure projects as well as a modest program of
micro-lending to the poor and cooperating with others to create area mutual
funds and a regional stock market
Advanced-Technology
Company, registered in the USA -- will invest in high-tech
companies abroad that are strategically important as potential joint-venture
partners for new high-tech companies on the Horn of Africa
East-African
Transportation Company, registered off-shore with separate
companies registered in each country where it has operations -- will invest
in infrastructure projects mainly in the field of transportation and to a
lesser extent in energy
Portfolio-Management
Company, registered off-shore -- will invest all free funds of
the International Development Trust in one portfolio and will pool all
internal endowments for management in another portfolio
The
scope of this proposal is generally open
ended, concerning
which
of the proposed companies and trusts will be formed and when,
which
groups of projects will be financed and launched within each company or
trust,
which
projects will be financed and launched within each group of projects, and
at
what level each individual project will be financed.
The
minimum investment required for making a
meaningful endeavor within this framework is about 10
million USD. If all the
projects are funded at the proposed levels, this would require a maximum
investment of about 3 billion USD
over 5 years. There is considerable
flexibility for an actual choice between
these two extreme values. The
lower
limits are defined by various requirements for meeting certain
threshold levels to achieve efficient operations for individual projects,
maximum
limits are defined by the ability to create the necessary
administrative capabilities and quickly expand these capacities for
effectively managing a wide variety of different kinds of activities, and
actual choices will be defined, between these two extremes,
by
the funds that are actually available for this endeavor.
The
budget estimates given here for individual projects or groups of projects are
usually for the maximum levels of funding that are currently considered to be
desirable and manageable. The
minimum requirements for starting a given company or trust, as well as
individual groups of projects or groups of projects, are also given when
appropriate.
This
set of projects was designed for maximum symbiotic
interactions within the whole set, whereby these positive
interactions may not all be obvious at first glance.
Therefore, in selecting a subset of
projects for actual implementation at any given time, these symbiotic
interactions should be carefully considered.
From
the financial perspective, two types of funding
are proposed:
one-time
grants from the capital resources
of the International Development Trust, at the top of the hierarchy of
companies and trusts, and
sustaining
grants on a yearly basis from separate internal
endowments
managed for each project or group of projects.
As
an example, consider the case of creating one “Department” for a specific
academic discipline within the Horn-of-Africa Institute of Technology.
One-time grants will be made by the
International Development Trust to the HoA IAT to establish office facilities,
to equip these facilities, to buy laboratory equipment, etc. to get this new
Department started.
It
will not make sense to pay salaries and other normal yearly operating expenses
with such one-time grants, depending upon the availability of funds each year to
do so. Rather, if and when a
Department is founded, a matching internal endowment
will be created, with capital for the endowment reserved on a one-time basis by
the International Development Trust. The
yearly profits from this endowment will be relatively steady and will be used to
pay salaries and normal operating costs. In
this way, when a Department is launched, the basis will also be established for
maintaining operations at a given level for many years without additional
capital being provided from the International Development Trust.
It
is administratively not advisable to create many different independent internal
endowments, one for each group of projects of the International Development
Trust. Some of these endowments
would be lucky, make large profits, and allow their projects to expand quickly. Others would be less fortunate, not earn adequate profits to
maintain current operations, and therefore force their supported projects to
scale down or even cease operations. The
relative levels of operations for different projects and groups of projects
should be managed according to other criteria
than just the accidental successes or failures of individual small endowments.
This
is the reason for creating an
off-shore Portfolio Management Company
under the International Development Trust -- as a wholly-owned subsidiary
company. All of the available
capital of the Trust will be transferred to this company for management.
This company will professionally manage one
large portfolio of investments for all internal
endowments
under the International Development Trust, with each endowment assigned a
specific fraction of the capital in this portfolio and the resulting income.
This portfolio will be optimized for steady income over many years as
well as distribution of risks, so that the beneficiaries of each of its
endowments can count upon a steady flow of income for financing their normal
yearly expenses. The risks will be
diversified over
different
kinds of investments, such as generally preferring bonds over stocks for
steady income in this case,
different
regions of the World, and
different
economic sectors.
The
Portfolio Management Company will also manage one or more other portfolios for
the International Development Trust, with specific goals for increasing
the capital available to the Trust.
This will consist of at least two separate portfolios of investments:
one
aimed at maximum profits for quickly expanding the working capital of the
International Development Trust and
the
other aimed at more modest profits, but with lower risks in order to assure
at least modest growth every year in the working capital of the Trust.
Initially,
the International Development Trust will make substantial
equity
investments
in normal profit-making companies -- both on the Horn of Africa and abroad.
It will do so in order to launch such companies that are strategically
important for its objectives and to establish relationships with key potential
joint-venture partners abroad for its new companies on the Horn of Africa.
However, within about 5 years, it will be feasible for the International
Development Trust to start selling off most of these equity positions in various
companies -- and use these funds for additional endowments to provide additional
sustained income for its non-profit activities and projects.
When
a company (normal or non-profit) is founded in Ethiopia, it is necessary to
start out with equity capital of at least 500,000 USD
in order to qualify for important exemptions from taxes
and customs duties.
Half of this sum must be transferred in cash to the Ethiopian National
Bank when the company is registered and the other half can be paid in later,
such as by making purchases abroad for equipment and supplies paid for in USD
and then imported into Ethiopia for use by the company.
In these cases, one should not try to form such a local company unless at
least 250,000 USD is available for immediate transfer and at least an additional
250,000 USD will be available outside of Ethiopia within a few months.
This technical requirement is independent of the funds that the company
actually needs to launch operations and it defines a lower minimum amount of
funding required at the beginning to launch a new company properly.
To
start these operations, the first step will
consist of founding the International Development Trust (offshore).
Then, the other companies of Figure 1 can be formed in any order
according to current priorities as minimum amounts of funds are available to
justify forming them. The
International Development Trust will then be at least the
initial owner
of these other companies.
Table of Contents & Chapter 1 >
Printed Version 15 Aug 1997 -- Web Version 22 Apr 2001
© Jack L. Davies 1997 & 2001
[Note for writers: Bookmarks are installed at the beginning of each section, i.e. 1, 2, & 2.1]